The painting “Dispute” was painted by the Russian artist Yu. Pimen in the middle of the last century. Namely in 1968. Like most of the works of this author, the painting “Dispute” shows the ordinary everyday life of the Soviet people.
The painting depicts a girl and a guy, who are most likely students. Judging by the situation around them, namely the simple stools and plates on the table, it can be assumed that the young people are in the dining room.
The young people are dressed simply. A girl with red hair and a small black bow on her head is wearing a black skirt, a brown jacket and black boots. The guy sitting opposite her is wearing a classic gray suit and shoes. Both are dressed in the classic style of those years.
It is clear from the gestures of the young people that there is some kind of argument going on between them. But most likely this is a peaceful dispute in which there are no insults, most likely in it everyone shows their point of view. It is clear from the guy’s gestures that he is trying to prove something, and as can be seen from the girl who is thoughtfully holding her hand to her chin, the young man’s arguments convinced the girl or at least made her think about what he was saying. Most likely, the girl is thinking about what to answer to her opponent. Everyone sits on the stool not completely, but on the edge, which suggests that everyone is ready to continue to defend their rightness.
But most likely the young man’s point of view was more thorough, so the girl has nothing to say and that’s why she is thoughtful in the picture. She probably won’t be able to answer until the end of the argument, and the young man will win the argument.
Yu. Pimenov painted the picture “Dispute” so clearly that it will not be difficult for anyone to understand what is happening in it. And everyone can see and understand the story of the argument between the girl with red hair and the young man in a classic gray suit depicted in the painting.
8th grade. Russian language
Essay description of the painting Pimenov's Dispute
This picture is very interesting. It depicts an argument. A dispute between a man and a woman, even though they are still young. I think that these are high school students, just like us. These are clearly not children, although they are in school uniform.
They are depicted against the background of a gray “uninteresting” wall. But the floor here looks like a chessboard. And the pieces in chess also argue in their own way. Perhaps these heroes are compared to the two remaining figures. Who will win depends on their argument! Women or men...
They sit at the table on stools. There's a boy on the right, and we don't see his face because he's turned away from the viewer. He almost jumps off the stool. He is clearly tense - in the heat of an argument. He's probably proving something. The wrangler himself is in a blue-gray suit and black pointed boots.
On the right is a red-haired girl in a brown school uniform. She's wearing boots, because it's probably autumn outside. The girl's hair is pulled back into a red ponytail. Perhaps this is all a hint that she is a “fox”! Girls, in general, are like that - they can be cunning. The guy is crucifying himself, proving something, and she can simply take part in the argument out of coquetry, out of some of her own interests. Girls, in general, are difficult to trust. They themselves never have a normal friendship. They can only be friends “against” someone else. It's not like that for us guys! We are friends - so for centuries. Of course, there are always exceptions.
So, the girl is really sitting here calmly on her stool. She looks at the guy with interest.
There is no third hero yet who could break their hands, as they always do in an argument. A kind of second. So that no one later says that the terms of the dispute were not the same, a witness is definitely needed.
Although the picture is rather gray, the fire of that very dispute is felt. And a guy can be so worried because this girl doesn’t take his word for it, doesn’t obey him. But women should have listened to men before. And now - everyone has their own opinion... And each is a rival to a man. They are harmful creatures - women, but without them, of course, it would be boring...
I hope that, after all, the boy will win the argument. He clearly needs it more! Male pride, after all. A girl, that is, a girl could understand this and feel sorry for him!
Although no, we don’t need such a victory “out of pity.” The guy himself will win, and will also play along with the girl a little so that she doesn’t cry, so that she, as a weak creature (with an unstable nervous system), would not be so offended.
Several interesting essays
- Characteristics of Anton Grigorievich Rubinstein in the story by Taper Kuprin image
Rubinstein is a professional Russian pianist, musician, conductor, a good-natured, selfless, generous person who was considered a fairly revered person among society
Lesson p Russian language .
Comparative essay cancer tera based on the painting by Yu. I. Pimenov “ Dispute ”
Lesson Objectives :
prepare teachingpreparing for a comparative essay based on the painting by Yu. I. Pimenov “Dispute”;
consolidate information about the speech situation and give the concept of non-verbal communication - sign language, facial expressions, postures;
to develop the ability to compile a comparative description of characters based on their appearance, facial gestures, and behavior in a certain speech situation;
teach students to use comparative linguistic means, update and enrich portrait vocabulary;
introduce the basic rules of dispute management;
contribute to the formation of cultural competence: give an idea of the national traditions of behavior of the British, Japanese and other peoples during a dispute.
Lesson equipment:
reproduction of a painting Yu. I. Pimenova “ Dispute”;
computer, projector.
During the classes.
Org moment.
Today we have an unusual lesson, a lesson in speech development. We present to your attention a sketch.
Scene.
In class, when discussing candidates for the position of class commander, a dispute arose: which of the two candidates (Sergei or Nastya) should be nominated.
Adele: I believe that the commander of our class should be Sergei. He is an excellent student!
Nadira: Why is this, Sergey! Let there be Nastya. She is the most fashionable girl in our class.
Adele: Still, I am convinced that Sergei. He always gets things done. But you can’t always rely on Nastya.
Nadira: Yes, Sergei never lets you copy homework. And in general you just like him.
Adele: Like,I don’t like it, it has nothing to do with it. Yes, understand that Nastya often misses school due to illness, and besides, in the second quarter she goes to a sanatorium.
Nadira: So what. You are not right. After all, she is my best friend.
Adele: Sergey is a relatively free person and can be more involved in cool things. All the guys in our class think so. So Sergei should be the commander of our class..
Nadira: No. I disagree. And in general, Nastya and I will invite Sergei to his birthday, but you won’t! You're just jealous of Nastya.
Conversation.
What did you guys see?
How do the parties to the dispute behave?
Which one is your favorite and why?
Whose behavior during the argument did you not like? Why?
In the first case, what kind of person were you talking about?
In the second case?
What does it mean to be a cultured person?
There are many indicators of a person’s culture, and one of them is the ability to argue!
What do you think we will do in class today? (talk about how to argue.)
Look at the picture?
What do you see? Who do you see7
What are they doing? (they are talking.)
What can we assume? (they argue.)
How can you find out? (observe the geos, describe the behavior of the characters, carefully examine the picture.)
How can you watch the heroes? (compare, describe.)
Would you like to compare the behavior of the heroes?
Let's try to compare the heroes and draw conclusions about how to behave during an argument, and how it is undesirable.
And the painting by Yu. I. Pimenov will help us with this“ Dispute” .
4.Write down the date and topic in your notebooks .
5. A story about the artist.
Everyonce, WhenII introduceyou, Guys, Withcreativity of the artist, I really want you to understand what makes him unique. Yuri Ivanovich Pimenov (1903-1977) is called a master of the pictorial short story.
Yu. I. Pimenov’s talent as a storyteller is manifested in the titles of his works, which are often the key to the content of the picture: “Marusya, it’s time for dinner!”, “Waiting,” “Let’s go to the cinema in the evening,” “Lonely flower seller.”
You ask, what is unusual, “unprecedented” in these ordinary life scenes? On this occasion, Pimenov himself wrote: “The world is full of poetry and beauty, which we often do not notice. Showing the beauty of everyday life, the charm of simple things is my task as an artist.”
Yes, he had a precious quality: the ability to make the ordinary extraordinary, that is, to expand the boundaries of the poetic, to make one feel the poetry of the surrounding everyday life, thereby teaching to appreciate every moment, to cherish life. Isn’t this one of the honorable tasks of art?!
By order of Pimenov, his interest in people, their spiritual life, their relationships led his work to the theme “Meetings and Conversations” (a series of paintings “Date”). He watched people on the street, in a trolleybus, in a cafe. One of the best films in this series is “Dispute” (1968)
Conversation on the picture
Are you interested in this picture?
What artistic means does the author of the picture use to show that we are confronted with debaters, people with different points of view?
Where do young people argue? What details allow us to judge this?
Describe the interior?
What are the features of the color of the canvas?
What do you think the boy and girl are arguing about? What problems might concern them?
Let's take a closer look at the characters in the picture. Describe the girl.
What is your impression of heroine?
Describe the young man's appearance.
What impression does the young man make?
Do you think the young man is confident in himself? How is he holding up?
So, you have already noticed that guys behave differently during an argument. Based on what details did you form this impression?
That is, based on understanding what language? Remember from rhetoric?
Yes, right, based on understanding the language of nonverbal communication?
What does verbal mean?
What does this language allow the speaker?
Give examples from your life that confirm this.
6. Physical education minute.
7.Spelling work.
Let's return to the language of nonverbal communication. Using its elements, characterize the boy and girl. Write examples in the table. Try to use short adjectives and short participles.
Conversation on the pictureWhat important quality can be noted in a girl?
What can you say about the young man as a debater?
Is he ready to understand the issues being discussed?
Is this scene from the life of young people in the 60s of the last century relevant for us?
What sayings, proverbs, aphorisms about disputes do you know?
Are you studying English? How do the British behave during an argument?
But the Japanese often use nonverbal means of communication during an argument.
In our country and republic, disputes are necessary to clarify the truth; they bring people together, and sometimes make them friends.
8. Vocabulary and stylistic work in groups.
Choose synonyms for the word dispute and give them an interpretation.
Form nouns indicating persons participating in a dispute, dispute, polemic.
Give an interpretation to the words pose, profile, gesture, facial expressions (portrait vocabulary).
Remember the linguistic means that are used to express the similarity of objects.
Remember the linguistic means that are used to express the differences between objects.
9. Systematization of material. Drawing up a plan.
What comparison method is possible in this case?
What are the differences between young people? What are the similarities?
What artistic means allow the author to express his thoughts?
10. Approximate plan.
1. Introduction. A young man and a girl are the heroes of Yu. I. Pimenov’s painting “Dispute”
2. Disputants.
a) General features.
b) Differences.
c) artistic means.
3. Conclusion. About the culture of arguing.
What can be said in the final part of the essay?
How should you behave during a dispute?
11. There is a model on the board.
RespectDon't insult
Listen
Don't interrupt
Reproduction of the painting “Dispute”
Don't be rude
Don't humiliate
Do not shout
Don't offend
12. Reflection.
What did we do in class today?
What new things did you learn and what did you learn?
13.Grading.
14.Homework: Write an essay using the memo for people who want to master the culture of argument (distribute the memo to students).
Kirillov Vladimir
Essay based on the painting by Yu. Pimenov “Dispute”
Argument is part of our communication. Everyone, without exception, argues, that is, they prove their point of view.
The painting by Yu. Pimenov depicts a girl and a boy. They are sitting in the school cafeteria. The boy's name is Kolya, and the girl's name is Katya. Kolya is dressed in a gray suit that is very small. Black boots. Katya is dressed in a brown suit, tights and boots. Teenagers argue about how many roots there are in an equation. Kolya thinks that there are two roots, and Katya proves that with x = 3 the denominator turns out to be 0. And yet Kolya is right, because x will have two meanings: positive and negative. As a result of the dispute, the friends come to the right conclusion. It is precisely such disputes that help them study well and solve tests correctly.
It was interesting for me to look at the guys’ gestures. Kolya raised his head up and confidently waved his hand, proving his opinion, looking into the face of his interlocutor. He is confident that he is right, but at the same time he does not raise his voice or shout. Katya listens carefully, leaning towards him. She is in no hurry to express her point of view, because she understands that Kolya is also good at mathematics, and perhaps she made a mistake. Who wins their arguments more often? Both. And the main thing is that these guys don’t quarrel because they respect each other’s opinions.
How should the discussion be conducted? In my opinion, the guys in the picture are doing everything right. And sometimes disputes lead to conflicts. What does this come from? I have often observed such situations. Vitya and Sasha argued about who is stronger. They decided to test it in arm wrestling. As a result, Sasha won. But he cheated, raised his elbow, and then began to help with his other hand and said that he had won, that Vitya was a weakling. That's how they quarreled, but, fortunately, they reconciled successfully. Conflicts occur very often and are almost impossible to avoid. Every person had them. Sometimes conflicts lead to quarrels, and sometimes even to boycotts, this is when people do not talk to each other and persuade others not to communicate with them either.
I liked the painting by Yu. Pimenov because the artist showed a clear example of how a dispute can be resolved culturally. I also try not to conflict with anyone, and if I argue, do it calmly and friendly.
Download:
Preview:
Essay based on the painting by Yu. Pimenov “Dispute”
Argument is part of our communication. Everyone, without exception, argues, that is, they prove their point of view.
The painting by Yu. Pimenov depicts a girl and a boy.They are sitting in the school cafeteria. The boy's name is Kolya, and the girl's name is Katya. Kolya is dressed in a gray suit that is very small. Black boots. Katya is dressed in a brown suit, tights and boots. Teenagers argue about how many roots there are in an equation. Kolya thinks that there are two roots, and Katya proves that with x = 3 the denominator turns out to be 0. And yet Kolya is right, because x will have two meanings: positive and negative. As a result of the dispute, the friends come to the right conclusion. It is precisely such disputes that help them study well and solve tests correctly.
It was interesting for me to look at the guys’ gestures. Kolya raised his head up and confidently waved his hand, proving his opinion, looking into the face of his interlocutor. He is confident that he is right, but at the same time he does not raise his voice or shout. Katya listens carefully, leaning towards him. She is in no hurry to express her point of view, because she understands that Kolya is also good at mathematics, and,perhaps she made a mistake. Who wins their arguments more often? Both. And the main thing is that these guys don’t quarrel because they respect each other’s opinions.
How should the discussion be conducted? In my opinion,the guys in the picture are doing everything right. And sometimes disputes lead to conflicts. What does this come from? I have often observed such situations. Vitya and Sasha argued about who is stronger. They decided to test it in arm wrestling. As a result, Sasha won. But he cheated, raised his elbow, and then began to help with his other hand and said that he had won, that Vitya was a weakling. That's how they quarreled, butFortunately, they reconciled successfully. Conflicts occur very often and are almost impossible to avoid. Every person had them. Sometimes conflicts lead to quarrels, and sometimes even to boycotts, this is when people do not talk to each other and persuade others not to communicate with them either.
I liked the painting by Yu. Pimenov because the artist showed a clear example of how a dispute can be resolved culturally. I also try not to conflict with anyone, and if I argue, do it calmly and friendly.
The furnishings depicted in the picture are extremely sparse. Ordinary dining room furniture, made of bent metal tubes with wood-chip seats and a table top.
There is no end to the fuss
bitterness floated towards the dawn,
and now we have no face,
there is nothing to look at each other.
Olga Bertgolts.
The furnishings depicted in the picture are extremely sparse. Ordinary dining room furniture made from bent metal tubes.
This could be a university or school canteen, or maybe a cheap eatery in some basement.
There are two of them, a guy and a girl. The artist called the painting “Dispute,” but perhaps it is not an argument, but simply a young man reading his poems, howling a little in the most pathetic places. Something in his posture and gestures speaks of this. Pointed patent leather shoes, all his clothes allow us to tell us that this young man is rather a “nerd”, in today’s language, he clearly does not devote his precious time to strength sports. It is very important for him to find out the opinion of his interlocutor about the issue raised and he gestures for better persuasiveness. In the heat of the moment, he even sits on the edge of a stool, which stands on a smooth tiled floor and risks losing his balance.
His interlocutor bends her fingers, selecting arguments in her defense, or rather in defense of her point of view.
She sits tightly on a stool, does not get excited, but listens to him calmly.
High boots tell us that it is more likely autumn, or early spring, but it is not too cold outside yet.
The girl has red hair, maybe her own, maybe dyed, but it suits her. They harmonize nicely with her costume, which also confirms that it’s unlikely to be too cold outside.
They talk enthusiastically with each other, they have a common topic, but not quite the same points of view. These are ordinary people, young people from those who would later be called “sixties”. It was they who created the fame of the poets Yevtushenko, Rozhdestvensky, it was these young people who came to the monument to Pushkin, to listen to the incendiary lines of the poets.
The artist’s brushwork is rather careless, although the picture is painted in small strokes. Some angularity in the line of the young man’s back, and the not entirely smooth line of the girl’s clothing, however, do not spoil the impression of the picture as a whole.
The plot of the film is simple and somewhat banal: it depicts an argument between two people - a guy and a young girl. The time period of what is happening is 60-70 years of the last century. As you can understand from the surrounding situation, most likely the events unfold in the canteen of some educational institution or other “government” institution. This is evidenced by the gray-blue walls, typical of that time, without decoration or luxury, covered with ordinary oil paint, a tiled floor in a “chessboard” pattern, budget and practical furniture - tables and stools on metal legs. There is nothing remarkable about the simple interior, so typical of most catering establishments of those years.
What do we see in this picture? A couple is sitting at the table: a guy and a very young girl. Her reddish hair is gathered at the back of her head and pinned with a bow, her bangs are cut evenly. She is wearing a formal suit made of dark fabrics with a skirt that reaches to her knees, and high boots without heels. Opposite the thoughtful girl we see her interlocutor, a dark-haired guy in a gray suit and patent leather boots. Everything suggests that these are ordinary students who do not have the means to spend extravagances: they are dressed modestly, but with taste.
A lively conversation ensued between the young people. However, this is clearly a peaceful dialogue, where everyone can express their point of view and defend it, bringing all kinds of arguments without resorting to rudeness, insults and humiliation of the interlocutor. At the moment captured in the picture, the guy is just arguing his point of view, doing it extremely emotionally. This can be understood by paying attention, among other things, to the position of his body: the movement of his hands, a slight tilt of his head, his right leg set to the side, etc. He clearly looks confident in his indisputable rightness, feels and anticipates his imminent victory over his opponent. The girl, on the contrary, behaves very restrained and looks more constrained and tense. The index finger is pressed to the chin, the straight back, the position of the head - everything suggests that her arguments have already been exhausted and she is hastily trying to come up with what words to defend her position and get out of an awkward situation. The girl is lost in thought, she is focused on the argument and hardly notices anything else happening around her. However, judging by the posture and gaze directed towards the interlocutor, the essence of the dialogue is far from indifferent to her, just like the arguments given by the opponent sitting opposite.
The author managed to depict what was happening so accurately that everyone who sees the picture will be able to understand the essence of what is happening without words. Gestures, clothing, postures - everything suggests that these are intelligent young people, perhaps talking about the upcoming session or the latest news. Their dialogue does not go beyond what is permitted and does not turn into abuse, although the note of tension inherent in any dispute is noticeable.
